Non-DOE GOGOs and federal authorities may be proposed to assist project team members in a candidate`s project through a Cooperation and Development Agreement (CRADA) or similar agreement. ANSWER: The minimum cost contribution varies according to the requirements of each FOA, but is generally 5%, 10% or 20% if the project is awarded under a cooperation agreement or grant. When a project bonus is granted through a technology investment agreement or an “other transaction” agreement (instead of a cooperation agreement or grant), the minimum obligation to participate is generally at least 50% of the total cost. Applicants should refer to the “Cost Share” section of the FOA, to which they wish to apply the cost-sharing requirements applicable to this FOA. Through cooperation agreements, technology investment agreements and other similar agreements, ARPA-E provides financial support and other projects that could fulfil ARPA-E`s legal mission. ARPA-E does not use such agreements to acquire real estate or services for immediate use or use by the U.S. government. REPONSE: You will find information about the content and form of the publication summary in the FOA. The model summary for public publication is available on eXCHANGE ( ARPA-E is working with the laureates to develop acceptable project bricks, starting from the expected achievement and working backwards on the development trajectory, in order to establish critical binary milestones that usually begin at the beginning of the second year of the project. Winners tend to propose milestones they think they can achieve, while the Agency encourages them to be aggressive and push the boundaries “at the margins, but not next door.” The milestones are expected to be specific, clear and quantifiable. They could be taken up and renegotiated “if there is still a clear path to the final goal” (Rohlfing, 2015).

Following an ongoing evaluation, the terms of the cooperation agreements provide that ARPA-E may enact the Federal Non-Nuclear Energy Act of 1974, 42. U.S.C 5908 applies to all other government transactions at each stage for research and development performance, “that… a government contribution on the use of the facilities, equipment, materials and resources allocated. The Act provides for the government to obtain the right to new inventions, unless a waiver is granted. That is why the Federal Non Nuclear Energy Act of 1974 applies to any outsourcing for the purpose of carrying out the research and development of the D as part of a cooperation agreement INTER ARPA-E or a grant in the absence of federal funding. ANSWER: A Technology Investment Agreement (TIA) is a kind of “other transaction” for which ARPA-E obtained authorization under the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010. ARPA-E may also use DOE`s “Other Operations” authority, in accordance with the Energy Policy Act 2005, to close EDAs with premium receivers. A description of an TIA is available at 10 C.F.R. 603.105. ARPA-E may negotiate an AIT if it finds that the use of a standard cooperation agreement, grant or contract for a project is not feasible or appropriate.

ARPA-E rarely exercises this authority and, in accordance with regulations, generally requires a 50% cost share. – Work authorization – Financial instrument used when a federally funded research and development centre (FFRDC) is a DEE laboratory in a project team.